Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed an unprecedented shift toward hybrid work arrangements, fundamentally transforming organizational structures and employee experiences worldwide. This narrative review examines the relationship between hybrid work and psychological wellbeing in the post-pandemic era, synthesizing empirical evidence from 2020 to 2025. Drawing upon Job Demands-Resources theory, Self-Determination Theory, and Boundary Theory, this review analyzes how hybrid work configurations influence multiple dimensions of psychological wellbeing, including work-life integration, autonomy, social connectedness, job satisfaction, and burnout. A systematic search across multiple databases yielded 251 relevant studies, with thematic analysis revealing complex, context-dependent relationships. Key findings indicate that optimal hybrid configurations (6-10 office days per month) enhance perceived efficiency and reduce stress, while satisfaction of basic psychological needs (autonomy, competence, relatedness) mediates positive wellbeing outcomes. However, challenges persist regarding boundary management, digital fatigue, social isolation, and manager-employee perception gaps. Gender and cultural factors, particularly in Indian contexts, moderate these relationships. The review identifies critical implications for organizational policy, including the need for flexible hybrid models, managerial training, technological infrastructure, and culturally sensitive interventions. Future research should prioritize longitudinal designs, cross-cultural comparisons, and examination of emerging challenges in sustainable hybrid work ecosystems. This review contributes to theoretical understanding and practical guidance for designing psychologically healthy hybrid work environments.